Sunday, February 24, 2013

My Road to the Oscars

This journal entry chronicles the films that have accompanied me on my Road to the Oscars. As I do every year, I try to see as many Academy Award-Nominated films before the big show. It is pretty difficult to see all of the nominated films, but I think I did well in seeing them, at least the Best Picture Nominations. Also, here are my predictions. Enjoy the Oscars tonight and we'll recap after the show!

My Predictions:


Best Picture
Winner - Argo
Who I want - Amour

Best Director
Winner - David O. Russell
Who I want - Michael Haneke

Best Actor
Winner - Daniel Day-Lewis
Who I want-Joaquin Phoenix

Best Actress
Winner - Jennifer Lawrence
Who I want - Jessica Chastain

Best Supporting Actor
Winner - Christopher Waltz
Who I want - Philip Seymour Hoffman

Best Supporting Actress
Winner - Anne Hathaway
Who I want - Anne Hathaway

Best Writing Original Screenplay
Winner - Zero Dark Thirty
Who I want - Moonrise Kingdom

Best Writing Adapted Screenplay
Winner - Lincoln
Who I want - Life of Pi

Best Animated Feature
Winner - Brave
Who I want - Wreck-it Ralph

Best Foreign Language Film
Winner - Amour
Who I want - Amour

Best Documentary Feature
Winner - Searching for Sugar Man
Who I want - Five Broken Cameras

Best Cinematography
Winner - Lincoln
Who I want - Life of Pi

Best Editing
Winner - Argo
Who I want - Life of Pi

Best Original Score
Winner - Lincoln
Who I want - Anna Karenina

My Reviews:



Skyfall (2012) 1/11/13
Starring Daniel Craig (My favorite, the most “human” of Bonds), Judi Dench, Javier Bardem (somehow, only Europeans are evil to us Americans, must be the accents), Albert Finney, and Ben Winshaw (who starred in Perfume: The Story of a Murderer, plays Q—the character who was dead, but resurrected for this film.)
Directed by Sam Mendes (one of my favorites; did American Beauty and Revolutionary Road). 
I’m not particularly the biggest Bond fan; I wasn’t raised to believe Bond was immortal, which is probably why to me this Bond film is the ultimate Bond film. My affinity for Mendes and Craig aside, this film emulates everything that is Bond. You have the cunning of 007 as he seduces hapless beauties, the left hands to the villains, and yes the villain, this mad, over-the-top caricature of what is evil struck perfectly by the always-one-step-ahead, subversive, former MI6 agent Silva (Bardem in a brilliantly frightening performance).
            In the first ten minutes Bond is dead? MI6 is in shambles as the threat of a cyber-villain arises and M (Dench) is deeply criticized with being old an out of touch with current affairs. This Bond film registers the current vulnerabilities of online identities and freedoms, and fears of cyber wars and terrorism. Consistently throughout, Cold-war espionage that fueled the Bond series prior to Skyfall is not simply questioned but completely dismissed as irrelevant. “Chasing spies,” quips Silva. “How old-fashioned.” MI6, the empire, and the old way of fighting “crime” are in ruins and viral crime is thriving.
Just like the new villains are feeding off the remains of what was once crime, the hero—Bond—is trying to revive his relevance off of what once was his identity. He used to be the suave, invincible Bond but died and had to be resurrected (in the first fifteen minutes mind you). “We’re going back in time,” Bond says to M, in the classic-Bond Aston Martin DB5. They head back to the home of his parents and his childhood, where they find Bond’s old caretaker Kincade (Finney), and they prepare for the end. Although the house is dilapidated, once Silva comes for Bond and M, it too is blown to bits and crumbles to ruins. Even in some far off Scottish castle you can’t escape the flames of destruction as Silva destroys the house and night falls. Under the glow of the flames, Silva chases down Bond, M and Kincade who retreat to the Chapel—the Alamo—for their civilizations last stand. Skyfall builds up to the sky what it was to be Bond, and all that comes falling down and this generation has to rebuild and redefine what it is to be Bond.

Argo (2012) 1/12/13
Starring:
Ben Affleck (who would be a much better actor if he hadn’t married J’Lo),
Bryan Cranston (with hair! From Breaking Bad, one of many recent, bit parts in films),
Alan Arkin (Little Miss Sunshine, Peevy in The Rocketeer)
John Goodman,
John Garber (Mr. Andrews in Titanic, amongst a myriad of other parts)
Clea Duvall (The Faculty, maybe her only notable film minus But I’m a Cheerleader),
Rory Cochrane (with an awesome mustache, played Slater from Dazed and Confused),
Kyle Chandler (did Early Edition in the mid 90’s, with the cat delivering the newspaper),
And many more actors that I’m resigning not to detail.
Directed by Affleck (Gone, Baby, Gone, The Town), produced by Affleck, George Clooney and Grant Heslov (who used to play a lot of goofy sidekicks to big macho muscle-men in the 90’s and around the turn of the century.)
            There, now that I’ve detailed the players, I can tell you why. Argo is a film about how Hollywood saved American (I say that sarcastically.) Although I found the film to be quite suspenseful and a decently made film, it is precisely the type of film that Hollywood and film enthusiasts around the globe love (yes I’m referring to the Hollywood Foreign Press Association who throws the Golden Globes; Argo won Best Drama and Affleck Best Director). Like The Artist last year, Argo plays upon the sentiments of cineastes, winning favor around awards season. Argo toots Hollywood’s horn, but really shows us the viewers the potential for film.
            As many films released this season deal with political subjects (this film included), Argo is really a film about awareness. How Hollywood should be aware of the power and possibilities of the medium of film. There is unrest in Iran in the late ‘70’s as the film explains is a result of American and British interference in the region. The U.S. embassy is overrun, and 6 Americans take secret refuge in the Canadian ambassador’s home. Argo is the plan to get them out safely. The government comes up with the plan to have the 6, plus Affleck (playing CIA agent Tony Mendez), pose as a film crew making a film sci-fi film called Argo.
            This set-up displays the power that film has. Firstly, it can be used to make us aware of what affect our government and our culture have on the rest of the world. Secondly and more importantly, the film can be exemplary of how we should take action as American citizens to do what is right. Although Argo to me is a little overrated, at its base it can be seen in a positive turn if we just open our eyes as Americans to the rest of the world.

Zero Dark Thirty (2012) 1/13/13
Starring Jessica Chastain (The Tree of Life, and last year’s darling The Help, playing a much different role), Jason Clarke, Kyle Chandler (yes the same from Argo), and Reda Kateb
Directed and produced by Kathryn Bigelow (The Hurt Locker)
Written and produced by Mark Boal (also The Hurt Locker)
            Kathryn Bigelow has directed two of the most important films post-9/11 (and the most important Swayze/Reeves collaboration), but seriously: The Hurt Locker, the first female to win the Best Director Oscar, dug up the (in)humanity and chaos of the wars that came directly after the terrorist attacks, a subject that was danced around by Hollywood for nearly a decade. Zero Dark Thirty too takes an in-your-face approach to the events leading up to the capture of Osama bin Laden.
            In the film, these secret “Black Sites” are the settings for torture reminiscent of Abu Ghraib. A presumed associate of al-Qaeda is beaten, starved and offered no rights. This film painstakingly pieces together these scenes of torture, and Maya (Chastain) sits aside and watches, at first with difficulty and disgust, but over time she gets used to it, is desensitized to the violence and horror of beating a human being. In an interview before the Golden Globes, Chastain claimed she plays a very somber, emotionless character, which was how Bigelow wanted her to play the role. Why? Because Maya is the every woman; she embodies the average American. She is very plain. You can put yourself in her shoes—interpret for yourself how you should feel about seeing this torture.
            Hopefully you find it as appalling as I did. It’s amazing, unbelievable the types of tortures that humans will put others through. In one scene, a bomb is wrapped around a man’s leg and will be detonated if he doesn’t identify a fellow “terrorist.” How easy it is to create these devices for violence against humans, how technology has progressed since the beginning of time to more easily kill ourselves. Have we come so far as a human race that we’ve reached a point of sadomasochism?

Silver Linings Playbook (2012) 1/14/13
There is a lot that can be said about overcoming the odds. David O. Russell has been seen by the Hollywood community as somewhat of a “bad boy” overcoming “adversity” or whatever. Whether or not this sentiment is shared by Russell is questionable, but looking at his films, especially of late (The Fighter and Silver Linings Playbook), it seems that he too would be in accordance. Even actor Bradley Cooper sheds the typical cocky, shallow jock role that he’s come to be known for in Wedding Crashers to The Hangover, and play a more complex version of that. Silver Linings Playbook is about shedding perceptions and overcoming adversity.
For me, the first few lines of the Counting Crows song “Raining in Baltimore” seems to too perfectly summarize the struggles and conflicts that are occurring in Silver Linings Playbook. They read:

This circus is falling down on it's knees
The big top is crumbling down
It's raining in Baltimore fifty miles east
Where you should be, no one's around
I need a phone call
I need a raincoat
I need a big love
I need a phone call

Being a post-modern disciple of the Counting Crows, this song popped into my head while watching Danny (Tucker) repetitively trying to escape from the loony bin in Silver Linings Playbook. Each time being returned the Baltimore-based mental hospital, but not after contributing some perspective to Pat’s (Cooper) life. His life is like a circus; paternal expectations to live up to, realizing a failed marriage, losing his job, and coping with his recently diagnosed bi-polarity. The big top that was the structure of his life has crumbled down, he’s alone, and after being released from the hospital, he’s needs a phone call.
Pat stays adamant about getting back with his ex-wife and enrolls Tiffany (Lawrence) to relay love letters to her. Tiffany also has her own adversity to overcome (being widowed, and labeled the town floozy.) Enter, or rather, escape again: Danny, who shows up just in time to teach Pat and Tiffany in a few dance moves, instilling in Pat a dash of jealousy to go with it. As the scene plays out, Danny dances closer to Tiffany, and everyone (including myself) is excited to see Pat jealous, falling for Tiffany. The film is about self-discipline and over-coming adversity because anything you love is worth fighting for. Pat picks up running and the motto of finding the Silver lining in all things, and after overcoming all the adversity of his past, the adversity of finding who he really is; Pat is allowed to fall in love for real.

Les Misérables (2012) 1/15/13
I never really understood why everyone loves the musical Les Misérables. Granted I had never seen the film or musical, or read the book—until now. I always wanted to wait until I read the book before I saw any other version of it, especially because of my affinity for France and the French somehow garnered my allegiance to the original novel written by Victor Hugo. So this was the first version of the work that I have seen, oddly enough, directed by Englishman Tom Hooper, and to say the least, I was not that impressed. The King’s Speech, also directed by Hooper, was also a film that I liked but expected more out of it, especially given all the Oscar hype that came along with it.
I will first admit that I am not a big fan of musicals—not that I am totally opposed to them, just that I haven’t seen many that have impressed me. And sadly, this version of Les Misérables failed to as well. Hooper’s vision and scale are evident from the very first shot, an impressive one of slaves pulling a French battleship ashore. In these shallow waters, the first scuffle between Jean Valjean and Jalvert occur, but like the puddle of water they stand in, the scene too seems shallow and the altercation trivial.
High Jackman was wonderfully steady as Valjean throughout the film and carried the plot through, him being nominated for an Oscar for the role justice enough for the performance, which I do not think was the best of the year, (Daniel Day-Lewis will be hard to beat.) Russell Crowe’s awful croaking was almost as bad as the underrated Sasha Baron Cohen’s performance was good. Where is his nod for Best Supporting Actor? Hooper however did succeed in capturing the wealth gap that seems so relevant to many American’s today, and the character of Fantine serves as a perfect metaphor for many people’s plight. The woman is at the mercy of the wealthy and ultimately has to resolve herself to prostitution to survive. While listening to Anne Hathaway’s “I dreamed a dream,” my heart too broke as I felt that I’ve been the victim of an unfair world treating me like dirt—yet I hold onto my dream.

Moonrise Kingdom (2012) 1/17/13
Written and directed by Wes Anderson (The Royal Tenenbaums, amongst others and most recently Fantastic Mr. Fox), starring Bruce Willis, Ed Norton, Frances McDormand, Anderson mainstays Bill Murray and Jason Schwartzman, and the unknowns Jared Gilman and Kara Hayward (who both knock it out of the park).
            Moonrise Kingdom takes place on an island in the 1960’s and chronicles the love affair, if you please, between Sam (Gilman) and Suzy (Hayward). Sam is an orphaned boy living in a foster home and had been sent to camp by his foster parents—he is a boy that is perennially ignored. Suzy comes from a family with higher expectations of her, her father (Murray) is aloof to much of the goings-on in the house including his wife’s (McDormand) affair with town coop (Willis). Suzy parents are controlling and overbearing and ignore what she desires in life. Suzy and Sam are made for each other.
            The brilliance of this film, like in all of Anderson’s other films, is his knack for a quirky, dry humor in his expertly crafted script (for which Anderson is nominated for the Best Original Screenplay. Sadly, his only nomination for the film). The film begins with a blend of moving shots so typical to Anderson films and static images with very balanced compositions, which add to the humor as a comedy of manners would. In fact, one could say that Anderson’s films are exactly that, and in this rendition, Anderson points the camera at the children, giving Suzy and Sam’s love legitimacy, although however innocent and naïve it is in comparison to the adults’ adulterous and unhealthy love (ie the love triangle between Willis, McDormand, and Murray). The innocence behind Suzy and Sam’s love is what makes is so pure and true. As Suzy tells her mother, “We’re in love. We just want to be together. What’s wrong with that?”

Flight (2012) 1/22/13
Directed by Robert Zemeckis (Forrest Gump, Back to the Future, and regrettably The Polar Express, Beawolf), starring John Goodman and Denzel Washington in an Oscar-Nominated performance, of which I think is probably the best aside from Daniel Day-Lewis in Lincoln.
            Flight is about a plane crash (big spoiler, sorry) and how the alcoholic, drug-addicted pilot (played by Denzel) miraculously landed the plane and was being charged for the deaths of four of the passengers. The landing was indeed an “Act of God” as nearly everyone throughout the film describes it. The plane was turned upside-down in the air then back again, to land in a field near the John the Baptist Pentecostal Church saving most of the people on board. But Denzel was drunk and cocked up.
            This film is all about faith. From the very beginning, the audience sympathizes with Denzel because, well he’s Denzel. That is the power of Hollywood stardom, find a big name actor that everyone sympathizes with and wants to succeed, and that was the exact intention of having chosen Denzel. Although we know that he was impaired by drugs when flying that plane, we root for him to get off scot free. Denzel is a plane-crash in himself, and it takes faith in himself to guide him out of the trouble, but only by confessing his alcoholism and drug problems. That is the message: having faith and belief in oneself to change for the better.

The Impossible (2012) 1/23/13
Directed by Juan Antonio Bayona, who also directed the frightening film The Orphanage. Starring Naomi Watts in a Oscar-Nominated role, one of my favorites, Ewan McGregor, and the young and equally deserving of a Oscar-nod, Tom Holland.
            A tsunami hits Thailand separating a vacationing family. Okay, how far can they go with this initial concept after the tsunami hits within the first ten minutes? Similarly to Flight, The Impossible is deals with a very simple message: chance. Make no mistakes, the film is about the wild chance that the family finds each other after a series of unlikely coincidences, but Bayona knows that and crafts the film in a unique way so as to avoid cliché. When the tidal wave hits, the camera follows Watts and her son (Holland) who throughout the film gives an incredible and emotionally wrenching performance. As the water crashes over the two, Bayona cuts the sound to give a sense that the audience is audible experiencing the same thing as the characters—a very brave attempt by the director which pays off for this film that is tied together by such a simple concept.
            The scene that has you rolling your eyes, but also brings tears to them is when the family is finally reunited. The father (McGregor) stops at a hospital encampment to look for his son and wife, passing his son in the hallways, having looked in the wrong direction at the wrong time. The son sees a ball that his brothers played with earlier in the film and runs outside, hears his brothers’ cries, they are reunited, and then the father sees the ball to and they are all reunited in a dramatic emotional climax. Tears fall and the credits roll. A very clichéd film, but a wonderfully emotional performance by Watts and an overlooked one by the youngster Holland.

Hitchcock (2012) 1/24/13
Directed by Sacha Gervasi, starring Anthony Hopkins as Hitchcock and refused to put on weight for the role, opting for the Academy Award-Nominated Make-up and Hairstyling crews to do their worst. Also starring Helen Mirren as Hitch’s wife, Alma Reville.
            Hitchcock is set in 1959, after North by Northwest blew up at the box offices and the master of suspense Alfred Hitchcock (Hopkins) was looking for a new project to blow the studio heads’ heads and stick it to them. This film is the fictionalized “Making-of” of Psycho. However brilliant the lead actors in the film are, unfortunately the film balks and doesn’t really offer much cinematically. Any lover of Alfred Hitchcock knows all the stories behind this production; they’re already aware of Hitch’s keenness towards his leading ladies, and his involvement with “The shower scene,” and the fact that he was never recognized for his excellence in filmmaking, (until he received an AFI Lifetime Achievement Award).
The film about Hitchcock is unlike Hitchcock films and is quite pedestrian. However, it does serve as an homage of sorts, not just to Hitch and his career, but specifically to Alma and her career. Hitchcock as a whole stirs up recollections of Hitch’s acceptance speech for the Lifetime Acievement Award in which he thanks Alma.

Django Unchained (2012) 1/27/13
Written and directed by the venerable Quentin Tarantino, Staring some Tarantino mainstays in Samuel L. Jackson and Christopher Waltz, also Leonardo DiCaprio, and Jamie Foxx
            Tarantino never fails to pen and bring a—shall we say—unique script to the big screen. Throughout his career, he has lived in the B-movie world, having grown up with grindhouse and exploitation films. Tarantino came up as an admittedly B-movie filmmaker when came of age during the independent film movement in the early 1990’s. Those films, like Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction revived otherwise dead careers for actors like John Travolta and Samuel L. Jackson, who have since then exploded in Hollywood. With age however, it seems that Tarantino’s budgets and acknowledgement as an auteur is making his films less “B-movie” in the pure sense of the term (small budgets, unknown actors and ridiculous plots,) and more commercialized and Hollywoodized “B-movie”. Those are my qualms with Tarantino.
            However, Django Unchained (although having fallen in the latter category of Tarantino films) was textbook Tarantino. It is a blacksploitation film set in Pre-Civil War America featuring a bad-ass “negro” (Tarantino’s word’s not mine.) Each of the characters bring their own world to the film. They all have an extravagant back-story and quirky traits, which is something that Tarantino excels at in all of his writing. Django (Foxx) is searching for his long lost wife, who was taught German by a former plantation owner. Shultz (Waltz) is a German doctor bounty hunter with a heart of gold and no prejudice (almost) against slaves. And then Calvin Candie (DiCaprio), owner of Candieland, has a knack for the finer, more-French things in life but doesn’t speak a word of the language. Tarantino is a creative writer-director and holds strong with this film.

The Invisible War (2012) 1/30/13
This Academy Award-Nominated documentary, directed by Kirby Dick (who also made  This Film is Not Yet Rated about film-censorship and the MPAA ratings systems), explores the culture of sexual harassment and rape in the U.S. Military. This is easily one of the most important films of the year, and one that everyone in this country should see.
Having the privilege to see the filmmaker in person, I was able to get an inside look into the choices made in the film. One that stuck out to me was Dick’s conscious choice not to show any of the rapists in the film was not to turn the film into a witch-hunt for those committing these horrendous crimes but to show the struggles of the victims, many of whom deal with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. The film doesn’t spend its time looking for justice in specific cases, but it is a battle cry for justice to be done in each and every case of sexual assault in the military. It attempts to change the culture of ignorance and fear in the military, where rape is considered an occupational hazard by senior officials, and exposes the “systematic problem with rape in the military,” as Dick says. 20% of women in the military are subject to sexual assault, but this is not just limited to the women; it includes men too. The film shows an equal balance of sympathy for the victims as well as challenging interviews with senior military officials, and attempts to bring this problem to the attention of the President. It has recently gotten the attention of Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta for something to be done. This is a must see.

Anna Karenina (2012) 2/5/13
Directed by Joe Wright (Pride and Prejudice and Atonement), and starring Keira Knightly and Jude Law.
            This is perfect film for Joe Wright to direct; however, it was not a perfect execution. It takes on qualities of a stage musical being film, and the compositions and camera movements are inventive. Wright is becoming known for his lyrical camera movements especially in his film Atonement, (which also stars Knightly, who oddly seems to only be attracted to period-pieces). His most creative scene is near the beginning of the film when Anna (Knightly) first becomes seduce by the young Count Vronksy (Aaron Taylor-Johnson). Anna enters the party and is promptly eyed by the Count, and as a dance within a dance, Anna tries to avoid the advances of the Count. But once they finally reach each other, and are enthralled in the dance together, everyone on the dance floor freezes and it only the two of them dancing. As they pass through the crowd, everyone else becomes animated in dance again. It is a very eloquent and surreal type of moment and unfortunately the most powerful moment in the film.
The film seems to drag on as if the actors were actually speaking Russian and not English. This was interlaced with some very moving images of Anna and the Count making love in green pasture, but there were only a few of said images. I was expecting more of an engaging love affair than this out of date tragedy.

Beasts of the Southern Wild (2012) 2/21/13
This indie wonder is written and directed newcomer Benh Zeitlin and stars newcomer Quvenzhané Wallis and nominated for Four Oscars including Best Picture, Best Directing, Best Screenplay and Best Actress (Wallis).
            There has been a lot of praise for this film this year and I am extremely glad that and small-budgeted film like this can come into Awards Season with such momentum and the chance to win at the Oscars. And I hope it wins something significant for the sake of independent films, with its great score and wonderful theme. However, this would not be my selection for Best Picture, and I haven’t hopped on the Quvenzhané Wallis-train.
            Firstly, as so many films that are made today, Beasts of the Southern Wild was filmed in the hand-held style of cinema vérité, of which I am not a big fan. It has been used well in many films since the French New Wave, but in Beasts, as in a lot of contemporary films, the movement of the camera becomes an annoyance. Its intention to add turmoil and uncertainty to the Hushpuppy’s (Wallis) world is successful, but the films cinematography is very much a product of the current media world in which we live. From Youtube to the news, the immediacy that this style of camerawork brings gives a realistic feel. After all, Cinéma vérité means “cinema truth”. But it also lends to this fast-paced mentality, and the movement and quick editing gives the viewer less time to concentrate on and digest the images. And there are many wonderful images throughout the film.
            Secondly, Quvenzhané Wallis’s performance was at best worthy of a nomination but not a win. Working with young actors is definitely a challenge, and I give kudos to Zeitlin for commanding a good performance from Wallis. But when it came to dialogue, aside from the voice over, Wallis does not have very much dialogue to memorize, and her actions are mostly just natural reactions to the other kooky characters in the film. Wallis gets and Oscar nod for playing herself. On a final note, the film’s message is admirable: standing up to the world of the beasts, and all the unfairness and inequality in the world. And as hushpuppy says, “I gotta take care of mine,” and so does everyone else.

Amour (2012) 2/22/13
Written and directed by Michael Haneke (The White Ribbon, Funny Games) and starring Emmanuelle Riva, Jean-Louis Trintignant, and Isabelle Huppert.
            Amour takes place in an apartment between the long married couple Georges (Trintignant) and Anne (Riva).  After Anne suffers a series of strokes, Georges must tend to and ultimately watch the love of his life slowly decay. Haneke’s approach to this subject is taken at the same pace as the 85 year old actress and examines the inner turmoil that Georges faces. Though there marriage has lasted for years, George tells Anne that there are still stories that he hasn’t told her, and as Anne becomes worse, Georges recounts some of these stories not only to calm Anne but also to sooth himself.
Although Anne is physically the one in decay—her speech becomes decreasingly inaudible her mobility limited—Georges is the one who absorbs much of the emotional decay. His precious wife is dying right in front of him and he has to come to terms with that and what it entails—dealing with his heartbroken daughter (Huppert) and his own heart break. Ultimately, like the pigeon who enters through the window, Georges must make the difficult decisions, he must release his wife from the suffocation of her illness, as he released the pigeon from the confines of the foyer. His wife’s spirit is no longer a caged bird, and ultimately, his spirit is with hers as they both leave the apartment and this world. And in the final scene, Anne reminds Georges not to forget his coat as they leave.
Michael Haneke and Amour come from a completely different generation of filmmakers than that of Benh Zeiltin and Beasts of the Southern Wild, especially photographically. Haneke uses a very static camera and lingers on the incredibly subtle performances by Riva and Trintignant There is time to examine their faces, theirs actions, the tone and atmosphere of the scene. This is definitely my preference in photography, not to take anything away from Zeitlin. And this is the Best Picture of the year and Haneke is the Best director. 

Thursday, December 20, 2012

My Journal: Sick and Sidetracked, but I'm Back

I hope that you all haven't forgotten about me. These last couple of weeks have been kind of non-stop, working an inordinate amount of days in a row and logging two illnesses in two weeks, but I've held her steady and true. A few days I wasn't able to watch anything, but on other days I made up for them. This round is only half of what I have. I'm a little behind on the writing part of this blog because of illness.

Also, Netflix released on Instant Watch Season 7 of How I Met Your Mother, and needless to say I had to watch it. In my challenge to watch on average 1 movie a night, television shows fall into the "fine print" category. There has already been a journal entry about The Walking Dead, and I counted that as one "movie." (Maybe one day I'll delve into the ever-blurring line between TV and Movies.) So, I will do the same for HIMYM, but because I love the show so much (I will go out on a limb and say that it is probably my favorite TV show of all time) and because I watch it so often, not just on a single day, I will reserve the HIMYM journal entry for its own special post.

In this round of journal entries, I went through a whirlwind of emotions that drove my choices in films. Some older (Ninotchka, Notorious), some from the same director (Woody Allen), some "holiday" (Eight Crazy Nights), and all worth checking out, and hopefully my words will inspire you, intrigue you, or whatever you to just go out of your comfort zone and check out one of these films.








****WARNING SPOILER ALERT****






22.) How I Met Your Mother (2005-2012) Season 7, 12/2/12 – 12/18/12
Exclusive journal entry coming soon!

23.) Hannah and Her Sisters (1986) 12/3/12
I went on a Woody Allen kick this week. I reserved a few of his films I haven’t seen and have wanted to see, and I went about it chronologically, this being the first of three.
As per usual for an Woody Allen film, there are nearly, nearly, too many stars to name, but I'll name 'em: Michael Caine, Barbara Hershey, Carrie Fisher (Princess Leia, duh. But also in a bunch of other ‘80’s gems ala When Harry Met Sally), Mia Farrow (in the wake of my Rosemary’s Baby outing), Diane Wiest (She was in Edward Scissorhands and Footloose!), don’t forget Max Von Sydow (he’s been in everything, most recently Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close), and naturally Woody Allen in a role that I actually liked him in.

(Left to Right) Diane Wiest, Barbara Hershey, Maureen O'Sullivan (the mother), Mia Farrow, Michael Caine
            Amongst Allen’s very poignant Thanksgiving dinners (there are three in this film), aunts, uncles, the family is crowded around the piano listening to Dad serenade Mom while uncle So-and-so gives the little kids what are surely their first beers. The scene plays out like a home-movie, everybody reminisces, “Hey, remember that one Thanksgiving when Uncle So-and-so gave all the kids beer?” There are family scenes in all of Allen’s films, but for me, this one is the most ardent scenes of his. It plays well into the rest of the theme of his film: it’s funny how things—people’s lives—can turn out years later.
            The film is about a love web, not a triangle, and how pleasantly amusing and pleasing the results can be. Mickey (Allen) and Hannah (Farrow) are divorced. Hannah’s new husband (Caine) has a crush on, then an affair with Hannah’s sister Lee (Hershey). Lee dumps him and falls for another guy. Step back a while, after Hannah and Mickey's divorce, Hannah tried setting Mickey up with her other sister Holly (Wiest) with disastrously incompatible results. Then after Mickey has a mid-life crisis of sorts years later, he and Holly end up, by chance, stumbling upon each other in a record store. They court and end up falling in love with each other. Timing. That is what love is all about. That is Woody Allen’s message here. And timing is a funny thing.

24.) Crimes and Misdemeanors (1989) 12/312
Starring Martin Landau (he was in Ed Wood, a few episodes of Entourage, and a long time ago North by Northwest. You’d barely recognize him without his glasses and with dark-colored locks.) Also starring Angelica Huston, Sam Waterston (form Law and Order and the little gem Capricorn One), Woody Allen and again Mia Farrow! Oh, and directed by the Woodster.
            It’s an “ethical dilemma because I’m married,” Cliff (Allen) says to his niece about his infatuation with Halley (Farrow). The difference between crimes and misdemeanors is essentially a moral dilemma. The film Crimes and Misdemeanors is split into several dualities. First, there are two moral dilemmas. The dilemma Cliff is having about whether he should cheat on his wife because the marriage is basically over, and the dilemma that Judah (Landau) is having, whether or not to kill his mistress and whether or not to give himself up.
I mean really, what better image do you need? (Martin Landau, Woody Allen)
            Another duality is that each man, Cliff and Judah confess to someone who in their lives would normally “confess” things to them. Cliff tells his niece all his relationship problems and seeks her guidance, and humorously so, she gives it. A doctor, Judah entrusts his secrets to his patient Ben (Waterston)—who is also a friend—while in the examination room. Judah is playing doctor, but instead of curing Ben’s slowly progressing blindness (justice is blind?), the roles are reversed again and Ben is the one giving out the consolation.
            These dualities become clear in the final scene of the film, when Cliff and Judah meet at a party and share a drink together. Judah explains the dilemma between crimes and misdemeanors. The fine line between them is in choice, choosing to be the bigger man and turning yourself in if you’ve committed a crime, but being an even bigger person and never making the misdemeanor choices that lead to their dilemma—their guilt. As Judah points out, referring to what seems like scripture, “And after the awful deed is done, he finds that he's plagued by deep-rooted guilt.”

25.) Manhattan Murder Mystery (1993) 12/4/12
This is Woody Allen playing Alfred Hitchcock.
Starring mainstays Angelica Huston, Alan Alda, and Diane Keaton.
            I feel like this is Allen’s humorous homage to Alfred Hitchcock. The entire story seems as if Hitch wrote it himself. The main characters all sit around a table discussing murder. This was something Hitchcock loved to do, have his characters parlor-talk about murder, then there talk turns to hysteria, and “imagining” someone close to them murders someone else.

Mirror Scene with Woody Allen.
            Carol (Keaton) starts it off, imagining that Larry (Allen) and her neighbor killed his wife to disguise several affairs he was having. In the process, Larry slowly becomes more convinced of the murder taking place, he becomes more jittery (just as Allen always is), but ultimately he become more brave, ultimately saving his marriage and riding in at the end of the film as Carol’s White Knight, which is escalated in the hilarious scene where Larry offers his neighbor his wife’s corpse, (that he doesn’t have). So he dresses up a dummy in women’s clothes and hides it in the trunk of his car and to make on last, feeble attempt to throw off his neighbor. The film ends in one last amusing homage to The Lady from Shanghai, when the neighbor confronts his mistress behind a theater screen, in a room full of mirrors as the same scene in Lady from Shanghai plays in the theater.

26.) Notorious (1946) 12/4/12
Speaking of Hitchcock, we’ll just follow up Woody with Alfred.
Starring Cary Grant, Ingrid Bergman (Casablanca but also Belle’s of St. Marys one of my favorite Christmas movies), and Claude Raines (also most notably from Casablanca) Directed by Alfred Hitchcock.
            I will be brief with this one. I could go on about the countless brilliant aspects of this film, like the stairway throughout the film, or how Hitch build suspense like none other in the wine cellar scene, or about how gorgeous Bergman is and accredit them to Hitch’s genius (which would be justified), but I will forgo the usual compliments, to say that man, does he know how to use the Dutch-tilt. For those who don’t know what a Dutch-tilt is, see the following photo:

Cary Grant photographed from an upside-down Dutch-tilt angle.
The Dutch-tilt or Dutch angle is typically used to show that there is something askew about the image or the scene in the film. Hitchcock does it the best, especially to add more suspense ti his films. And I applaud him for using it with such grace (unlike Kenneth Branagh in Thor as I describe in an earlier post.)
            Another underrated mastery of Hitchcock’s is how he block’s his kissing. At the time of Notorious’s release, the Production Code had rules about kissing—and just about everything else for that matter. But, it stated that a kiss couldn’t last longer than three seconds. So, Hitchcock got past that by the heated make-out session between Grant and Bergman that is sprinkled with rubbing of noses and heavy breathing—which sounds more sensual to you? And who is the smart one now?

27.) Eight Crazy Nights (2002) 12/6/12
In celebration of St. Nick’s day, I watched this, one of the most raunchy, disgusting (Holiday) films ever, but for some reason I still love it. This animated new “classic” stars all of the Happy Madison (the Adam Sandler production company) regulars. Sandler of course, Rob Schnieder, Kevin Nealon, etcetera, etcetera, and lined with raunchy and sometimes (rarely) touching songs by Sandler.
            My youthful affinity for Sandler and his earlier films (especially Waterboy) is probably the reason that I’m not completely turned off by the filth that is this film. Everyone’s allowed a couple guilty pleasures, and for me, Holiday films, in particular Christmas films, no matter how bad they are, hone into my sense of nostalgia. This is one that I remember freezing my tush off watching it on the big screen in my barn with my brother and some of my closest friends. It was hilarious and appealed to our high-school minds, and looking at it again, I realize that it is part of a genre of animated films: animated musicals. This is a practice that has gone out of style, say so-long to all the claymation classics. With the likes of Pixar greats like Toy Story for example, animated films have good soundtracks (regardless of how you feel about Gary Newton) with original songs, but it doesn’t feature the characters singing these songs. The same thing can be said for Up and many of the other Pixar films. Eight Crazy Nights is a throw-back (for Sandler) to his raunchy stand-up days, mixed with some self-deprecating songs that just plain offend you and everybody else you know.

28.) Ninotchka (1939) 12/7/12
Starring the great Greta Garbo and her muse Melvyn Douglas in the second of their three pairings, (Two-faced Woman which I watched earlier and As You Desire (1932) which has now been added to my “watch” list).
Directed by Ernst Lubitsch, who was Garbo’s favorite director to work with, and written by a young Billy Wilder (who directed one of my personal favorites Some Like It Hot (1957), also Sunset Boulevard (1950) and Double Indemnity (1944) which are I write about later in my journal). Also, George Cukor was scheduled to direct this but left to do a little old film called Gone with the Wind (1939).
            Now that I’ve made all my pretentious six-degrees-of-Kevin-Bacon connections (which I swear will all have relevance later), I will feign over Greta Garbo for a while, but only after I comment on the writing! It seems I tend to do this a lot with these older films, but this is something that should be understood that older films were some much better written. Then had less of a visual crunch (ie Special Effects) to lean on. In Ninotchka, the titular Garbo is a stern Russian “comrade” sent to Paris then becomes falls for the slick Melvyn Douglas character. Garbo’s attitude exudes in sequences like when Melvyn Douglas is attempting to seduce Ninotchka (Garbo) for the first time. She says to him, “You’re so talkative.”

Garbo overpowering Douglas with her charm.
            They kiss, and then Douglas replies, “Was that Talkative?”
            “No that was restful.” She says deadpan. “Again.”
            They kiss.
            “Thank you,” she says.
            “Oh my barbaric Ninotchka. My impossible unromantic statistic.”
            They kiss.
            “Again,” she says.
            Exchanges like that are just wonderful and show how much control both the character Garbo was playing and Garbo herself was in control. She typically played very powerful, strong and feminist characters. If you look at the rest of Ninotchka, she over-sees three other bumbling, womanizing Communist Russians, (who actually quip a line I find hilarious: “Capitalist methods: they accumulate millions by taking the loss.”) But back to Garbo. In relation to the whimpering Douglas, she is in control the entire time. In the exchange I mention, although she is the one being kissed, it is on her terms. She is telling Douglas what to do. She commands, “Kiss me.” And, “Again.” It’d be hard finding another woman on screen who demanded that much attention with just three words.


29.) The Last Detail (1973) 12/7/12
Starring Jack Nicolson, Randy Quaid (cousin Eddy, anyone?), and Otis Young.
Directed by Hal Ashby, who directed Harold and Maude (1971) that I watched earlier, and written by Robert Towne who wrote Chinatown (1974) which was directed by Roman Polanski who also directed Rosemary’s Baby (remember?). Although uncredited, he wrote Bonnie and Clyde until it was taken out of his hands.
            From what I’ve seen and especially what I’ve read, Hal Ashby is a directed who flourished and suffered during the American New Wave/New Hollywood movement during the late Sixties and Seventies. Unlike Spielberg or Francis Coppala, Ashby’s legacy especially in mainstream American cinema has been overlooked. Most credit this to his lack of visual style, which may be a fairly valid point; however, his films do have a style. His style is dealing with different issues.

Hal Ashby, Otis Young, Jack Nicholson on the set of The Last Detail.
Harold and Maude and The Last Detail are both politically charged films. The Last Detail deals directly with the military, in this case the Navy, and two sailors (Nicholson and Young) who are ordered to take a third (Quaid) to prison, but throughout the entire film, the three do just about everything but follow military orders. They drink, fight, and get hookers, and then in the end nearly go AWOL. They start to question the establishment much as Harold does throughout Harold and Maude. He constantly does the opposite of what his mother expects.
The Last Detail is also a coming of age story, like Harold and Maude. Randy Quaid’s character does everything. He loses his virginity, he gets really hammered with the guys, he almost sees his mother one last time, and says that he doesn’t want to do any of that again because he doesn’t want to ruin the significance of it. This is almost like Ashby’s career. He dabbles in a little bit of everything, the generation gap, the military, the counter-culture movement in Coming Home (1978), and a sociological experiment in Being There (1979) just to name a few. They all deal with something a little bit different. So, maybe Hal Ashby’s style was just a little bit different.

Thursday, November 29, 2012

My Journal: Tis the Season

The decorations are up in our winter wonderland of an apartment; the lights are lit, the stockings are hung, and the fake, sparkly snow is draped softly over our shelves. Tis the season for holiday joy, etc. But it's also the season where I love to sit by the fake fire, cuddle up and watch some classic films with Turner Classic Movies as my guide (I don't think I can plug that station enough). My film journal is taking root!

The past five or so days have been fun and productive. There have been a few movies that I have chosen to watch and a few that have chosen me, so to speak. We have Basic InstinctHarold and Maude, Edward Scissorhands, The Philadelphia Story, and Two-faced Woman. I chose each for certain reasons, some because there was a connecting element, like a director or actor, and others are connected in unintentional ways, an actor or actress surprising me in a film I didn't know they were in. So here are films 14 through 19:


14.) Basic Instinct (1992) 11/24/12
The most wonderful piece of trash I’ve ever watched. 
Starring Michael Douglas (someone who I grew up hating because my mom would always watch his cheesy, Kathleen Turner Romantic Comedies but who I’ve grow to enjoy in a cult sort of way), Sharon Stone (who you definitely don’t see enough of in this film), and too many other “that guy” characters to name each. Directed by Robocop’s Paul Verhoeven.
I just finished a book called The Film Club about a father who lets his son drop out of school as long as they watched 3 films a week together. The father chooses many art films in which to show his son to try and give him the most effective and “formal” education possible. But to keep his son’s attention, one of the first films they watched was Basic Instinct. To which, the son replied: “Now that’s a great film!” I have to agree.
Sharon Stone in Basic Instinct. What a hartlett. 
The dialogue (as the father tells the son) is indeed repulsively wonderful. It has a very ridiculously complex and sometimes ambiguously incomprehensible plot. But at the end, the point of the film is to get to the end. It wraps things up exactly how you want every film to end: the protagonist (Douglas) ends up with the girl (Stone) even though she’s no good for him. That is my problem with the film. But, this is outweighed by my “cult” love for Michael Douglas and the extremely rich-with-cheese dialogue (from Douglas, Stone, and every other “that guy” in the film) that reminds you of Barney Stinson picking up girls at McLaren’s Pub.
And of course, you can’t forget the interrogation scene; I mean come on, who doesn’t love laughing at Wayne Knight sweeting in embarrassment. Also, the car chase scene where Douglas crashes his ways through the San Francisco streets, I was just waiting for a little green bug to pop into view. Basic Instinct was so full of too-clever one liners and movie reference that it had more cheese than Scary Movie.

15.) Harold and Maude (1971) 11/25/12
Starring Bud Cort and Ruth Gordon (who a few years earlier became the oldest actress at the time to win an Oscar for her role in Rosemary’s Baby). Directed by Hal Ashby.
Aside from the great soundtrack by Cat Stevens, which is essential to the film, a lot more can be said about this film, but I’ll try to be short. Visually, I would compare it to The Graduate, where there is a strong balance between times of musical interludes and the lack of music completely and also a moving, active camera and a static one. This can be seen from the very first shot, where the camera follows Harold’s (Cort) feet as he walks through the parlor. They don’t show his face, just his feet, as he prepares a noose to hang himself. In contrast to later in the film, Harold and Maude talk to each other in a patch of daisies, then in a grave yard with uniform white headstones. The camera zooms out, pixelating the characters, making them practically blend in—assimilate almost.
Ruth Gordon and Bud Cort in a daisy patch in Harold and Maude.
These two examples and the age gap of the new couple, Harold and Maude represent the heated topic of the day: the generation gap. Ashby expresses his own conundrum and the perception that the older generation (that of Harold’s mother) is so out of touch with the younger (Harold’s) generation, but the relationship between Maude (also the older generation) and Harold shows that there is still much to learn. This is definitely a film of its time, everything that Harold does, all of his suicide attempts and antics with Maude, they are all initially rebellions against the authority figures of the older generation, but eventually with the help of Maude, they flower into not just Harold’s rebellion but his identity, which is what he is in search of the whole film, isn't it?

16.) Edward Scissorhands (1990) 11/26/12
Starring Johnny Depp, Winona Ryder, Anthony Michael Hall (as the bully/punk boyfriend of Winona Ryder) and Vincent Price in his last ever film role. Also, Diane Wiest and Allan Alda as the parents of Winona Ryder and Robert Oliveri as her brother, who was Nick Szalinski in Honey, I Shrunk the Kids and Honey I Blew Up the Kid. Directed by Tim Burton.
            Having seen this film already, I simply enjoyed this film for what it was worth, but Tim Burton’s themes are unavoidably noticeable. His creativity, style, and humor are evident throughout, most distinctly in the cookie-cutter cul-de-sac; houses painted in stark but bright pinks, blues and greens emphasize his criticism of the ‘burbs: that everyone who lives there is just a little bit weird.
Snowing on Winona Ryder
            Burton’s inclusion of Vincent Price just magnifies the darkness of the picture; Price is known for many of his Gothic horror films, collaborations with early horror masters William Castle and Roger Corman, and also his uniquely foreboding voice that I personally have a particular affinity for stemming from my childhood. When I would think ominous, I would think of Ratigan from Disney’s The Great Mouse Detective (Yes! Vincent Price was indeed Ratigan’s voice!) And what would the film be without the hauntingly beautiful score that is never more touching than when Edward (Depp) shaves an ice sculpture of Kim (Ryder)? The television station I watched this on bills the film as a “Christmas” film, and the ice flakes that gently loft down on Kim capture the spirit of the holiday. With the music, the snow falling down, and a robot boy (that Edward is) having true emotions for a girl are embodied in the child-like wonder that the Holiday Season allows. I will for the time being reserve my comments on Burton’s more recent movies, but this is one of his most original and creative works.

18.) The Philadelphia Story (1940) 11/27/12
Starring Cary Grant, Katherine Hepburn, Jimmy Stewart (who won a Best Actor Oscar) Ruth Hussey, and Roland Young. Directed by Hollywood Studio workhorse George Cukor, who collaborated 10 times with Hepburn and directed 20 different actors in Oscar-nominated Performances.
Hepburn and Stewart, champagne in hand.
            The film centers around a family who is under media scrutiny and is based off of an actual Philadelphia family. At the base of the film, there is a classic romantic comedy brewing that includes a divorcée (Hepburn) who wants to get remarried. But her ex (Grant) hires a tabloid team (Stewart and Hussey) to write a bomb of story destroying her reputation (but secretly winning her back). Stewart falls for Hepburn, Hepburn falls for him, Grant falls back for Hepburn, and she falls back for him. The plot is about as eye-rolling as you’ve ever seen, but what makes this film so endearing (for me at least) are the performances and the set-pieces.
            Ole Jimmy Stewart gets loaded on Champagne (always Champagne and probably actual Champagne) at a dinner party with Hepburn and uncle Willie (Young), and they return to her house, they (Jimmy and Katharine) have a romantic dip in her pool and everyone thinks: scandal! Yes, this is the scene however with the most classic scene, Hepburn in Stewart’s arms Jimmy mimicking or maybe foreshadowing a George-Bailey-esque performance gobbles some sweet poetry, and they kiss. Classic cinema at its best, and of course, in the end, Cary Grant and Katherine Hepburn, the original divorcés end up back together again. Under the Production Code, it would not have been heard of to let such a heresy as divorce exist. So it didn't, and the plot wrapped up happily-ever-after.

19.) Two-faced Woman (1941) 11/27/12
What a gem to stumble upon, so appropriate indeed. After having watched The Philadelphia Story on DVD, this was on the never-failing Turner Classic Movies right after I finished.
Starring the stunning and intense Greta Garbo (so sassy was she in this—her last film!), Melvyn Douglas, Roland Young (Uncle Willie from The Philadelphia Story), and Ruth Gordon (yes, many years before her performance as Maude in Harold and Maude.) Also, directed by George Cukor again (coincidentally)!
            Cukor follows the formula that made him such a mainstay in Hollywood during the thirties, forties, and into the fifties: the remarriage comedy. In this particular film, the couple never divorces, but they might as well have. Larry (Douglas) marries his ski instructor Karin (Garbo) on a whim after he falls dramatically in love with her after she saves him from falling backwards down a mountain on his skis. He goes back to work in New York, basically shafting her in the process, so she comes to New York to surprise him. She suspects foul-play on his part, so as Garbo does so well, she decides to play afoul too. She pretends to be Catherine, her twin sister (of which she has none—shucks! Two Garbos would be great!)
Greta Garbo seducing Melvyn Douglas
Pretty standard rom-com, but what sets it apart to me, and what kept me rolling throughout the film was how Garbo was able to keep delivering line after innuendo-laced line of the stuff romantic comedies are made of. In a scene in a hotel room when Karin is “playing” her twin sister Catherine, Larry offers her cash money (her being his sister-in-law, not for any other "services") to help her pay for her clothes. She denies him quipping, “It’s against my morals,” to which he replies in a beat, “You sure have an unusual sense of morals.” Then he trusts himself upon her.
Another impassioned scene between Larry and “Catherine” finds the two again in a hotel room. Catherine (Garbo mind you) comes on to Larry saying, “I looked up that word you told me about: alone. It means to be with you.”
              “That sounds like a charming dictionary,” he slyly replies. No matter how good a film may look today, no matter how many special effects, or camera movements, none of those aspects of the movies can compare to dialogue like this.





Saturday, November 24, 2012

My Journal: Round 2


Here's Round 2

It has been about a week, which means it's high time for my newest installment of My Journal. Although I'm not watching a film every day, I am making up for it when I can. These are films 5-13, so I think that puts me ahead of the count by about  one. Keep on keeping on.


****WARNING****SPOILERS****






5.) Captain America: The First Avenger (2011)
11/12/12
Starring Chris Evans, Tommy Lee Jones, and Hugo Weaving (that’s right, V is now a rogue Nazi super villain); directed by Spielberg protégé Joe Johnston who directed Jurassic Park 3. He also has a very generic body of work behind him, so I think that it is safe to say that Johnston is Hollywood’s director—movies that appeal to the masses and don’t particularly say anything worth saying. Captain America certainly fits into that category. It was indeed entertaining, as long as the cheese didn't melt from all the explosions in the movie. The number of inaccuracies in military code aside, there were too many instances when I kept thinking this is ridiculous. The leading lady was in every action scene even though she wasn't even American, the friend died for Captain America (Evens), the evil red-faced Nazi villain died in a spectacular final fight scene. Yawn. I can’t even remember any of the characters names because they all formed perfect stereotypes. The CGI of Evans before he becomes Captain America is a joke and he has no chin. And, the sound mix was bad. When you watch a movie this bad it is hard to find the redeeming things about it, but it had potential. If only Johnston could have turned this film into a good neo-noir film like he did in directing one of the great fictional World War II films—The Rocketeer.

6.) Hellboy (2004) 11/13/12
Staring Ron Perlman, Slema Blair, and John Hurt and directed by the always interesting Guillermo del Toro. In contrast to Captain America, Hellboy is a much more well-rounded film. The major difference being: character development. This is something that del Toro as a director is good at doing while blending his uniquely Gothic style of filmmaking. The special effects, like in his more critically adored film Pan’s Labyrinth, are not all CGI, and they add a more substantial and gritty texture to the action. Hellboy as a character is complex and so is his love-interest, they are well written and have a telling past. Hellboy obviously has been locked up and branded an outcast by the media and even the government. Liz (Blair) has been hazed for her unique ability to set herself a blaze and has coping issues with it. You get the sense of this conflict in the characters from the very beginning. This is something that isn’t often seen in action/super hero flicks (ie Captian America) very often. Also the action sequences didn’t over shadow the story.

7.) Thor (2011) 11/13/12
Staring Chris Hemsworth, Anthony Hopkins and the always lovely but unpredictably inconsistent Natalie Portman. Directed by Kenneth Branagh. I watched this film to finish of the superhero/comic book kick that I was on, seeing that it was available streaming. I was also intrigued by two elements: Kenneth Branagh and Natalie Portman. Branagh has had a sketchy career as a director and should probably stick to acting, preferably as Sir Lawrence Olivier in My Week with Marilyn (2011) where acted as a director better than he directed. For instance, he and cinematographer chose so many unsavory dutch-tilts throughout the film, particularly at the beginning of action sequences, that the typically useful and jarring camera angle just became annoying and predictable. Branagh’s interest in theatrical or Shakespearean-esque dramas is obvious, but his delve into this superhero/comic book/whatever-you-want-to-call-it genre that is taking over movie screens just seems formulaic. And Portman’s involvement must have been the result of some sort of Entourage-type contract arrangement, but as my roommate recently pointed out to me, she has a track record of inconsistent roles (i.e. the Star Wars prequels). She’s beautiful in this film, but she slips into an over acted performance, making me roll my eyes with how cheesy and predictable the lines delivered when she first “runs into” Thor and how she oogles over him in her trailer because of his big muscles and his arrogance. Fortunately I’m done with the film.
8.) The Walking Dead (2010-2012) 11/14/12 – 11/17/12
( I know this is not a movie, but it’s the same basic concept and I spent a lot of hours committed to the series so here it is.)
Created by Frank Darabont (director of the excellent adaptation of Stephen King’s The Shawshank Redemption and a film I feel is highly underrated The Mist, both co-incidentally co-starring Jeffrey DeMunn who is Dale in The Walking Dead and delivers and equally excellent performance.) So, I know I’m way too late on The Walking Dead bandwagon; I’m way behind on the “best show on television,” according to many of my friends, but I got to it, started it, and am hooked. The success of other AMC shows aside and done on an incredibly cheap budget especially in the early episodes, the success of this show probably comes from its holding true to original zombie apocalypse films, like Night of the Living Dead. Although in my opinion there is a lot of over acting and cheesy zombie attacks, I respect the choice of the show’s creators to execute it this way, holding true to that original campy-ness, because they establish the strong social commentary based on every decision made by each character and how it affects the rest of each group. Several characters in particular stand out to me. Dale was probably my favorite character, selfless (for the most part), wise and forward thinking; he provided the rest of the group with a moral compass. He of all the other characters tried continually to hold onto that little bit of the past, that little bit of “civilization,” if you will. Although Rick claims to be trying to do so, his decisions are too often influenced by his family and Shane (a hot-headed Neanderthal, in my opinion) who usually forces his hand. The most underrated of the characters is of course Glenn, who has the best intentions, and is absolutely right when he says, “I’m tired of lying. I’m not good at it, and people get killed when you don’t tell the truth.” (That is, of course, paraphrased.) And, to keep this post short, I’ll end by saying that I also approve of Glenn’s decision to start the repopulation of the post-apocalyptic world with that farm girl. You go Glenn.

Maria Schell
9.) The Brothers Karamazov (1958) 11/20/12
Based off of the novel by Dostoevsky which I’ve never read, starring Yul Brenner, Lee J. Cobb (from 12 Angry Men and On the Waterfront amongst others), and ole William Shatner as the priest Alexi Karamazov. To my surprise, this film was directed by Richard Brooks who direct Cat on a Hot Tin Roof  and In Cold Blood amongst other notable films that I won’t bore you enumerating. His style in this film at least was a surprise to me. Cat and Cold Blood, although really good movies, are more conventional stylistically. For example the lighting in this film reminds me of German expressionism but with colors. Brooks blends greens and blues and reds in his lighting, which is a far cry from many movies you see today, and after having watched Thor not too long before this film, it was a shocking change of pace from the lighting palate of blue in contrast with orange that seems to be the industry standard in movies nowadays. On a lighter note, Maria Schell plays the foxy temptress who literally dances between the eternally drunk Father Karamazov (Cobb) and the gambling romantic Dmitri (Brenner). She is so elegant and true when responding to Dmitri’s bride-to-be Katya’s pleas as to why she wouldn’t let Dmitri from her attention, Schell sweetly replies something like “If you were ever to experience the pleasure of passion, you would understand why I can’t be without Dmitri. Because there is passion whenever I’m with him.”


Robert Young and Eleanor Powell in Honolulu
10.) Rosalie (1937) 11/21/12
Directed by the esteemed W. S. Van Dyke (who did Tarzan the Ape Man and The Thin Man films.) Staring Eleanor Powell, Frank Morgan and Ray Bolgar. Now, you may not regognize these actors’ names, if you saw them in this musical from 1937, you would say, “Hey! Isn’t that the wizard! And that’s the scarecrow!” Yes, Morgan played the wizard from The Wizard of Oz, and Bolgar was the scarecrow. The film Rosalie was produced from the same studio as The Wizard of Oz: MGM, which during the 30’s was known for its musicals. Also during this era, actors, actresses, directors, etc. were in contract to certain studios, which meant that often times, actors and actresses would be in many movies together. Thus, MGM gives you this film starring practically half the cast of one of the most timeless film classics. I watched this film on TCM (the best station on cable! No arguments, it’s a fact.) as part of their Eleanor Powell 100th birthday Tribute. This was the first movie of the day that I watched with her in it, and the most striking moment to me came from this tap dance number she does as she’s disguised in a military uniform of some sort. Powell is light on her feet and trying to prove to the rest of the boy that she is one of them, only to reveal herself and her long locks at the end of the number. Typically, I’m not a fan of musicals, but every now and then, TCM reminds me of the magic of movies. One of there old films is playing and at that point in time, I just decide to stop and watch…and watch and watch, and every second is magical. I’m transported into Hollywood’s dreamland. This film wasn't particularly a great film, but it put my mind in that mood that comes about this time every year, when all I want to do is relive the magic of great classic movies.
11.) Honolulu (1939) 11/21/12
Directed by Edward Buzzell (who directed the latter 2 Thin Man films.) Starring again Eleanor Powell who is indeed quite lovely, and George Burns and Gracie Allen! That’s right folks form The Burns and Allen Show. If many of you don’t know this show, it’s your loss. It was on in the early years of television and unfortunately not a lot of the episodes exist today. Television studios where in the habit those days of filming shows, then reusing the tapes that they recorded TV shows on as a way to save money, so many early television shows are lost. But I digress; the film was really stolen by Gracie Allen. Eleanor Powell although lovely and wonderful in a tap dance number around the pool on the ship to Honolulu, is overshadowed by Allen’s hysterical and witty comic relief. For example, when she meets Robert Young’s character (yes, Robert Young from Father Know’s Best), Allen quips “My name is Millicent De Grasse, but most people just cut De Grasse.” Show stealer! There is also an adorable and funny moment at the end of the film when Burns and Allen share their first scene of the film. Burns and Allen were married for about forty years before Allen’s death in 1964. The scene at the end of the film sort of sums up there school mate kind of crush for each other. Find the film and watch it, because I have difficulty summing a moment that pure. Also, my first exposure to George Burns was from my grandma, who showed me and my siblings the film Oh, God! Burns plays an ornery God, and John Denver plays the helpless, down-on-his-luck protagonist. I need to watch that one again.
George Burns and Gracie Allen
12.) The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2011) 11/21/12
Starring Daniel Craig (quickly becoming one of my favorite contemporary actors) and Rooney Mara. Directed by one of my favorite directors David Fincher (with a résumé too long to sum up but some of my favorites are Benjamin Button, The Social Network, and Fight Club.) Fincher does it again. Typically, I’m not a big fan of remakes, but as Rosalie did to me for musicals, Fincher did with remakes. While maintaining a true sense of the novel and the original film, Fincher was able to create his own piece of art, something that is often times lost when films are remade. A good remake of a film or adaptation of a book should stand alone as its own piece of art, and in my opinion, shouldn’t be judged on its commitment to the previous work. Dragon Tattoo does exactly that, beginning with the way Craig is photographed, scruffy, scratched face, a man with wrinkles caused by stresses. The beauty of the art direction when Mikael (Craig) first arrive on the island, the image almost looks as if it is filmed in black and white. The starch snow against the black outlines of the cars and Mikael’s dark clothing. It represents the “facts” of Anita’s death that for so long have seemed black and white. I could go on and on about the Fincher’s photography, but I will be brief concluding with one of the most unique moments in the film. Near the end, when Mikael is tied up by Martin (played by another great actor in the film Stellan Skarsgard). Martin flips in a little tune “Sail Away” as he’s about to cut Mikael up. The scene is reminiscent, to me at least, of the cocaine-purchase-gone-wrong scene near the end of Boogie Nights and Funny Games, oh and American Psycho’s Huey Lewis chop scenes. The light music mixed with the seriousness of murder makes it all the more chilling!


13.) Roman Holiday (1953) 11/22/12
Directed by William Wyler (Ben-Hur), starring Gregory Peck, Eddie Albert, and the baby-doll faced Audrey Hepburn. I’m a sucker for romantic films, especially older films, and everything that I love about this film is embodied in Audrey Hepburn’s innocence as the princess. Essentially a Cinderella story in flipped from rags to riches to riches to rags (a plot seen a few times since I’m sure), Hepburn is the sweetest in the scene along the river. Yes it is the most iconic scene of the film, but for a reason. It’s the moment that Gregory Peck falls for Hepburn (little did Peck know, that the audience fell for her form the opening scene.) Both soaking form evading the secret service after her, Peck looks into her eyes, water dripping from her short, dark curls, embraces her with a kiss. What a wonderful moment. It is like salt on the wound after watching the exchange between Peck and Hepburn in his room shortly after, where they both realize the complexity and impossibility of their love for each other.